5 edition of Grammatical relations in Pāli and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan found in the catalog.
Grammatical relations in Pāli and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan
Peterson, John M.
|Statement||John M. Peterson.|
|Series||LINCOM studies in Indo-Europan [sic] linguistics ;, 01, LINCOM studies in Indo-European linguistics ;, 01.|
|LC Classifications||PK1071 .P48 1998|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||iii, 258 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||258|
|LC Control Number||99514862|
As many people know, English has a particularly impoverished case system. This means that we don't see much evidence of (overt) case to mark grammatical function (like subject or object). If you've got a sentence like Mary saw Jim, then you know from the word order that it was Mary (the subject) doing the seeing. Free online NTA UGC NET guide book covers the solved question papers of old UGC NET, NTA NET, UGC SET, UGC SLET exam. The previous year’s answer keys are also given. The syllabus, sample or model question paper of National Eligibility Test (NET) / State Eligibility Test (SET) / State Level Eligibility Test (SLET) Examination of University Grants Commission (UGC) conducted by National Testing.
In this paper I present a view of case marking that explicitly rejects a commonly assumed position that its primary function is to merely distinguish arguments from one another (cf. Comrie , ; Dixon , ), while marking them according to their specific semantic or pragmatic functions is a Cited by: 9. Dissociations Between Argument Structure And Grammatical Relations Christopher D. Manning and Ivan A. Sag In Pollard and Sag () and Pollard and Sag (Ch. 1–8), the sub-categorized arguments of a head are stored on a single ordered list, the subcat list. However, Borsley () argues that there are various deﬁ-.
COVID Resources. Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus. As most of the concepts coming from traditional grammar ‘case’ is multiply ambiguous (see Blake ; see also Spencer, this volume, for discus-sion). In a narrow sense it pertains to morphological case, but the term ‘case marking’ is frequently used to cover also alternative means of encoding grammatical relations .
The Future of work for disabled people
The Roux brothers
Emergency fuels utilization guidebook
The Franchise affair
Science and Technology Text Mining
Curbing drug and alcohol abuse
Arizona Wildflowers (Wildflowers for Beginners)
Nursing intervention for people with a mental handicap
Christmas at Bracebridge Hall
The MIRA engine review
The thirty-nine steps
Yakima-Klickitat Fisheries Project
This book is a detailed study of the grammatical relations of Pali, a Middle Indo-Aryan language which is also the canonical language of the therava-da-Buddhists of Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia. On the basis of this dataPrice: $ Grammatical relations in Pāli and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan.
[John M Peterson] Add tags for "Grammatical relations in Pāli and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan". Be the first. Book\/a>, schema:CreativeWork\/a>. This book is a detailed study of the grammatical relations of Pali, a Middle Indo-Aryan language which is also the canonical language of the theravada-Buddhists of Sri Lanka and Southeast : Rajesh Bhatt.
However the scrutiny of certain syntactic constructions such as converbal clause chaining or coordinate conjunction reduction shows that they are not necessarily sensitive to the basic grammatical relations (Bickel & Yādava ), in other words, the notion of pivot is not fully operational in the IA languages.
This chapter gives an overview of the current state of the art of research on ergativity in Indo-Aryan. First, it discusses a number of theoretical and terminological issues concerning synchronic and diachronic dimensions of ergative alignment and outlines a typology for exploring the relationship between ergativity and other alignment types with particular reference to the South-Asian.
On the basis of constructions which are demonstrably sensitive to grammatical relations, viz. verb agreement, gapping in nonfinite clauses, control constructions and matrix-coding (‘raising. In the introductory paper “Ergativity in Indo-Aryan and beyond” (1–37), the editors offer, in their words, “an overview of the current state of the art of research on ergativity in Indo-Aryan” (p.
The chapter starts off with general introductory remarks on ergative alignment, drawing on a number of classical. These language groups, the syntactically ergative and Philippine languages, allow an inverse mapping in the prominence of the two highest terms between argument structure and grammatical relations.
A level of argument structure is shown to be particularly well motivated by the examination of syntactically ergative languages. A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan On the basis of constructions which are demonstrably sensitive to grammatical relations, viz.
verb agreement, gapping in nonfinite clauses, control constructions and matrix-coding (‘raising’), we argue that these relations are defined as ‘nominative or ergative S/A’ in Maithili and Cited by: Grammatical Relations in Ali and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan.
München: Lincom Europa. Regamey Constantin. "A propos de la ‘construction ergative’ en indo-aryen moderne." In: Redard Regamey Constantin. "Le problème de l'ergatif." Bulletin du Cercle Linguistique de CopenhagueVIII-XXXI.
John M. Peterson, Ph.D. () in Linguistics, University of Kiel, is a visiting professor of Linguistics at the University of Leipzig. He has published extensively on South Asian languages of both Munda and Indo-Aryan stock, including "Grammatical Relations in Pāli and the Emergence Cited by: The book also sheds light on grammatical patterning in languages with differential object marking: in some languages marked and unmarked objects have identical grammatical properties, whereas in other languages marked objects are more active in syntax.
As the Indo-Aryan language family has played a paramount role in recent theories of Ergativity and of alignment typology and change, this volume is highly relevant to experts working on these languages and to scholars interested in grammatical relations and it will figure in all future debates in these fields.
In developing a theory that incorporates grammatical relations as primitives, crucial use is made of the notion of Accessibility Hierarchy (Keenan and Comrie ).' It is In this regard that the phenomenon of Ergativity is discussed in relationally-based grammatical literature ( by: This paper presents an attempt to investigate the origins of ergativity in Iranian languages, drawing upon diachronic and synchronic analyses.
In so doing, I will trace the development of the ergative structure back to Old and Middle Persian where, it is argued, the roots of ergativity lie. I will specifically show that the ergative pattern as currently obtained in the grammatical structure of Cited by: 3. Pandharipande Rajeshwari, Kachru Yamuna.
"Relational Grammar, Ergativity and Hindi-Urdu." Lin [Crossref] Payne John R. "The Decay of Ergativity in Pamir Languages." Lin [Crossref] Peterson John. Grammatical Relations in Ali and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. München: Lincom Europa. Cambridge Core - Linguistic Anthropology - Grammaticalization - by Paul J.
Hopper. McConvell, Patrick Grammaticalization of Demonstratives as Subordinate Complementizers in Ngumpin-Yapa* An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Blackwood Australianist workshop and at the ALS conference inand thanks go to colleagues who provided comments at those meetings and later.
In linguistics, grammatical relations (also called grammatical functions, grammatical roles, or syntactic functions) are functional relationships between constituents in a clause. The standard examples of grammatical functions from traditional grammar are subject, direct object, and indirect object.
In recent times, the syntactic functions (more generally referred to as grammatical relations). SCREEN VERSION: The Verbal Syntax and Ergativity of Georgian: It is relatively unusual among languages of the world to find examples of what is called mixed ergativity; this phenomenon occurs when some syntactical elements of a language can be ascribed to an ergative-absolutive typology, but others must be considered part of a nominative-accusative structure.
In recent years grammatical relations have come to play a prominent role in linguistic theories. This volume brings together papers that address a variety of theoretical issues involving grammatical relations, drawing on data from a broad range of natural languages.
Grammatical relations Grammatical relations must be carefully distinguished from thematic roles. In what follows, we illustrate three grammatical relations: subject, first object, and second object. The apparent contradiction between the existence of second objects and the binary-branching hypothesis is discussed in Chapter 7.These language groups, the syntactically ergative and Philippine languages, allow an inverse mapping in the prominence of the two highest terms between argument structure and grammatical relations.
A level of argument structure is shown to be particularly well motivated by the examination of syntactically ergative : $Grammatical Relations in Pali and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan.
München: LINCOM Europa (LINCOM Studies in Indo-European Linguistics, 1 / LINCOM Studies in Asian Linguistics, 6).